Compared · gitlab
13 GitLab MCP servers. Which one to use.
Every GitLab server we index, with whether its source is still reachable and whether we hold a screening verdict. None currently carry a source-liveness flag.
Scope: 13 servers indexed from the MCP registry as of 2026-07-25. Servers whose authors never published to the registry are not listed here, so treat this as the registry's view rather than a complete census.
| Server | Publisher | Source | Screened | Quality | Install |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitLab MCP Server | io.github.jmrplens | no flag | REVIEW | 100 | remote endpoint |
| Advanced GitLab MCP server | io.github.structured-world | no flag | REVIEW | 95 | npm @structured-world/gitlab-mcp |
| Gitlab | io.github.pipeworx-io | no flag | REVIEW | 85 | remote endpoint |
| Gitlab Public | io.github.pipeworx-io | no flag | REVIEW | 85 | remote endpoint |
| io.github.zereight/gitlab-mcp | io.github.zereight | no flag | REVIEW | 85 | npm @zereight/mcp-gitlab |
| com.mcparmory/gitlab | com.mcparmory | no flag | REVIEW | 82 | pypi mcparmory-gitlab |
| io.github.detailobsessed/efficient-gitlab | io.github.detailobsessed | no flag | REVIEW | 82 | npm efficient-gitlab-mcp-server |
| io.github.vish288/mcp-gitlab | io.github.vish288 | no flag | REVIEW | 80 | pypi mcp-gitlab |
| MCP Gitlab | io.github.crunchtools | no flag | REVIEW | 76 | pypi mcp-gitlab-crunchtools |
| io.github.mshegolev/gitlab-ci-mcp | io.github.mshegolev | no flag | REVIEW | 75 | pypi gitlab-ci-mcp |
| GitLab Documentation MCP Server | io.github.nunolima | no flag | REVIEW | 74 | docker docker.io/nunolima/gitlab-docs-mcp:18.7 |
| io.github.ozanmutlu/gitlab-docs | io.github.ozanmutlu | no flag | REVIEW | 70 | npm gitlab-docs-mcp |
| io.github.dubuqingfeng/gitlab-mcp-server | io.github.dubuqingfeng | no flag | REVIEW | 64 | npm @dubuqingfeng/gitlab-mcp-server |
“Repo unreachable” means the source returned a not-found from two vantage points, which can also happen when a repository is made private or moved - see source liveness. “Screened” is the advisory verdict on the listing text, never a safety clearance; the methodology spells out what each dimension does and does not test.