← Index
Compared · bitbucket

6 Bitbucket MCP servers. Which one to use.

Every Bitbucket server we index, with whether its source is still reachable and whether we hold a screening verdict. None currently carry a source-liveness flag.

Scope: 6 servers, mostly mirrored from the MCP registry as of 2026-08-13. Most servers whose authors never published to the registry are absent, so treat this as close to the registry's view rather than a complete census.

ServerPublisherSourceScreenedQualityInstall
Bitbucket MCP Serverio.github.lawp09no flagREVIEW90pypi bitbucket-mcp-py
Bitbucket MCPio.github.FabianSchurigno flagREVIEW85docker ghcr.io/fabianschurig/bitbucket-mcp:0.18.5
com.mcparmory/bitbucketcom.mcparmoryno flagREVIEW80pypi mcparmory-bitbucket
io.github.MrRefactoring/atlassian-dc-mcp-bitbucketio.github.MrRefactoringno flagREVIEW80npm bitbucket-datacenter-mcp
io.github.b1ff/atlassian-dc-mcp-bitbucketio.github.b1ffno flagREVIEW80npm @atlassian-dc-mcp/bitbucket
Bitbucket MCPio.github.MatanYeminino flagREVIEW62npm bitbucket-mcp

“Repo unreachable” means the source returned a not-found from two vantage points, which can also happen when a repository is made private or moved - see source liveness. “Screened” is the advisory verdict on the listing text, never a safety clearance; the methodology spells out what each dimension does and does not test.